%
CapRateCity
Free cap rate calculators for every US market
← All comparisons

Rockford vs Chicago for Rental Property Investing

Side-by-side comparison of Rockford, IL and Chicago, IL — cap rates, rent, prices, and investment metrics.

Chicago wins 4–3 across key metrics
Rockford leads on cash flow (4.69% vs 3.03% cap rate) · Chicago leads on population growth
Metric
Rockford, IL
Chicago, IL
Est. Cap Rate
4.69%
3.03%
Median Home Price
$135,000
$310,000
Median Monthly Rent
$920
$1,620
1% Rule
0.68%
0.52%
GRM
12.2x
15.9x
Price / Income
3.2x
5.0x
Property Tax Rate
2.12%
2.08%
Vacancy Rate
7%
5.8%
Population Growth
-0.2% / yr
0.1% / yr
Annual Appreciation
1.8%
2.4%
Population
148,655
2,665,039
Median Income
$42,800
$62,400

Rockford vs Chicago: Which Is Better for Investors?

Cash flow: Rockford has the edge with an estimated cap rate of 4.69% compared to Chicago's 3.03%. Neither city passes the 1% rule outright, so deal sourcing and value-add strategies become more important. Median home prices are $135,000 in Rockford vs $310,000 in Chicago, while rents come in at $920/mo and $1,620/mo respectively.

Growth & appreciation: Chicago is growing faster at 0.1% annually, while Rockford is losing population. Chicago leads on home value appreciation at 2.4% per year.

Costs & risk: Property taxes are 2.12% in Rockford vs 2.08% in Chicago. Vacancy rates of 7% and 5.8% are mixed — Chicago has the tighter rental market.

Bottom line: Chicago edges out Rockford on most key metrics. While cap rates are moderate at 3.03%, Chicago's overall profile is stronger. Use our free calculators to model specific deals in Rockford or Chicago.

Rockford, IL
4.69% cap rate · $135,000 median · $920/mo
Full analysis →
Chicago, IL
3.03% cap rate · $310,000 median · $1,620/mo
Full analysis →
The CapRateCity Report
Weekly market analysis: highest cap rate cities, emerging markets, and deal breakdowns. Free, no spam.