%
CapRateCity
Free cap rate calculators for every US market
← All comparisons

St. Louis vs Columbia for Rental Property Investing

Side-by-side comparison of St. Louis, MO and Columbia, MO — cap rates, rent, prices, and investment metrics.

Columbia wins 4–3 across key metrics
St. Louis leads on cash flow (4.40% vs 3.95% cap rate) · Columbia leads on population growth
Metric
St. Louis, MO
Columbia, MO
Est. Cap Rate
4.40%
3.95%
Median Home Price
$205,000
$225,000
Median Monthly Rent
$1,180
$1,180
1% Rule
0.58%
0.52%
GRM
14.5x
15.9x
Price / Income
4.3x
4.6x
Property Tax Rate
1.24%
1.22%
Vacancy Rate
6.8%
5.2%
Population Growth
0.1% / yr
0.8% / yr
Annual Appreciation
2.2%
2.6%
Population
293,310
128,000
Median Income
$47,800
$48,600

St. Louis vs Columbia: Which Is Better for Investors?

Cash flow: St. Louis has the edge with an estimated cap rate of 4.40% compared to Columbia's 3.95%. Neither city passes the 1% rule outright, so deal sourcing and value-add strategies become more important. Median home prices are $205,000 in St. Louis vs $225,000 in Columbia, while rents come in at $1,180/mo and $1,180/mo respectively.

Growth & appreciation: Columbia is growing faster at 0.8% annually vs St. Louis's 0.1%. Columbia leads on home value appreciation at 2.6% per year.

Costs & risk: Property taxes are 1.24% in St. Louis vs 1.22% in Columbia. Vacancy rates of 6.8% and 5.2% are mixed — Columbia has the tighter rental market.

Bottom line: Columbia edges out St. Louis on most key metrics. While cap rates are moderate at 3.95%, Columbia's overall profile is stronger. Use our free calculators to model specific deals in St. Louis or Columbia.

St. Louis, MO
4.40% cap rate · $205,000 median · $1,180/mo
Full analysis →
Columbia, MO
3.95% cap rate · $225,000 median · $1,180/mo
Full analysis →
The CapRateCity Report
Weekly market analysis: highest cap rate cities, emerging markets, and deal breakdowns. Free, no spam.