%
CapRateCity
Free cap rate calculators for every US market
← All comparisons

Columbia vs Greenville for Rental Property Investing

Side-by-side comparison of Columbia, SC and Greenville, SC — cap rates, rent, prices, and investment metrics.

Greenville wins 4–3 across key metrics
Columbia leads on cash flow (4.97% vs 4.26% cap rate) · Greenville leads on population growth
Metric
Columbia, SC
Greenville, SC
Est. Cap Rate
4.97%
4.26%
Median Home Price
$205,000
$280,000
Median Monthly Rent
$1,150
$1,380
1% Rule
0.56%
0.49%
GRM
14.9x
16.9x
Price / Income
4.5x
5.6x
Property Tax Rate
0.56%
0.55%
Vacancy Rate
6%
5.2%
Population Growth
0.8% / yr
1.6% / yr
Annual Appreciation
2.8%
3.5%
Population
137,541
72,610
Median Income
$45,800
$50,200

Columbia vs Greenville: Which Is Better for Investors?

Cash flow: Columbia has the edge with an estimated cap rate of 4.97% compared to Greenville's 4.26%. Neither city passes the 1% rule outright, so deal sourcing and value-add strategies become more important. Median home prices are $205,000 in Columbia vs $280,000 in Greenville, while rents come in at $1,150/mo and $1,380/mo respectively.

Growth & appreciation: Greenville is growing faster at 1.6% annually vs Columbia's 0.8%. Greenville leads on home value appreciation at 3.5% per year. Strong population growth typically translates to sustained rental demand and long-term price support.

Costs & risk: Property taxes are 0.56% in Columbia vs 0.55% in Greenville. Vacancy rates of 6% and 5.2% are mixed — Greenville has the tighter rental market.

Bottom line: Greenville edges out Columbia on most key metrics. While cap rates are moderate at 4.26%, Greenville's overall profile is stronger. Use our free calculators to model specific deals in Columbia or Greenville.

Columbia, SC
4.97% cap rate · $205,000 median · $1,150/mo
Full analysis →
Greenville, SC
4.26% cap rate · $280,000 median · $1,380/mo
Full analysis →
The CapRateCity Report
Weekly market analysis: highest cap rate cities, emerging markets, and deal breakdowns. Free, no spam.