%
CapRateCity
Free cap rate calculators for every US market
← All comparisons

Pittsburgh vs Lancaster for Rental Property Investing

Side-by-side comparison of Pittsburgh, PA and Lancaster, PA — cap rates, rent, prices, and investment metrics.

Lancaster wins 7–0 across key metrics
Lancaster leads on cash flow (4.30% vs 4.25% cap rate)
Metric
Pittsburgh, PA
Lancaster, PA
Est. Cap Rate
4.25%
4.30%
Median Home Price
$220,000
$225,000
Median Monthly Rent
$1,250
$1,280
1% Rule
0.57%
0.57%
GRM
14.7x
14.6x
Price / Income
4.2x
5.1x
Property Tax Rate
1.36%
1.35%
Vacancy Rate
6%
5.5%
Population Growth
0.2% / yr
0.4% / yr
Annual Appreciation
2.3%
2.6%
Population
302,971
64,000
Median Income
$52,800
$44,200

Pittsburgh vs Lancaster: Which Is Better for Investors?

Cash flow: Lancaster has the edge with an estimated cap rate of 4.30% compared to Pittsburgh's 4.25%. Neither city passes the 1% rule outright, so deal sourcing and value-add strategies become more important. Median home prices are $220,000 in Pittsburgh vs $225,000 in Lancaster, while rents come in at $1,250/mo and $1,280/mo respectively.

Growth & appreciation: Lancaster is growing faster at 0.4% annually vs Pittsburgh's 0.2%. Lancaster leads on home value appreciation at 2.6% per year.

Costs & risk: Property taxes are 1.36% in Pittsburgh vs 1.35% in Lancaster. Vacancy rates of 6% and 5.5% are mixed — Lancaster has the tighter rental market.

Bottom line: Lancaster edges out Pittsburgh on most key metrics. While cap rates are moderate at 4.30%, Lancaster's overall profile is stronger. Use our free calculators to model specific deals in Pittsburgh or Lancaster.

Pittsburgh, PA
4.25% cap rate · $220,000 median · $1,250/mo
Full analysis →
Lancaster, PA
4.30% cap rate · $225,000 median · $1,280/mo
Full analysis →
The CapRateCity Report
Weekly market analysis: highest cap rate cities, emerging markets, and deal breakdowns. Free, no spam.