Population growth is one of the strongest leading indicators of housing demand. More people means more tenants, tighter vacancy, and upward pressure on both rents and home values. These 25 cities lead the nation in annual population growth rates.
These 25 cities represent the top-performing markets based on growth. Spring Hill, TN leads the ranking with 4.5%/yr growth at a $445K median price. Even Rexburg, ID at #25 shows 2.6%/yr — a solid metric.
Across this ranking, the average cap rate is 2.81% (vs 3.81% nationally), average prices are $447K (vs $333K nationally), and average rents are $1,680/mo.
Geographic distribution: the West (15 cities), the South (10 cities). The West dominates this ranking — investors in other regions may need to look at out-of-state investing.
If you only had one data point to predict whether a rental market will perform over a 10-year hold, population growth would be it. Population growth predicts rental demand more directly than employment numbers (people can commute), more reliably than home-price appreciation (which can be priced into entry cost), and more durably than cap rate (which compresses as growth attracts capital).
The cities on this ranking are growing materially faster than the national average. That growth comes from a mix of:
The mechanism is straightforward but happens on a multi-year lag:
The 2022–2024 Sun Belt apartment supply absorption is the textbook recent example. Phoenix, Austin, Nashville, Charlotte, and similar metros saw 2020–2021 rent growth of 15–25% — extraordinary — followed by 18–24 months of flat or declining rents as massive supply pipelines delivered. Investors who bought at peak rents with peak-rent underwriting got hurt. Investors who underwrote with conservative rent growth and bought into the supply correction are positioned to do well as the next cycle plays out.
The market is partially efficient. When migration to a metro becomes a household-name story, prices have already moved to reflect it. The investor question is whether prices have moved enough to fully discount continued growth.
Three tests for whether a growth market still has upside at current pricing:
Cities on this list that pass all three tests are the highest-conviction continued-growth plays. Cities that fail one or two are still growth markets but with reduced near-term upside.
For the broader framework on growth versus cash flow investing, see cash flow vs appreciation investing, and cross-reference this list with the best appreciation markets — the cities that appear on both are the strongest combination of in-place growth and durable long-hold thesis.
Population growth is the single best predictor of long-term rental demand. These 25 cities are growing faster than the national average, which means more people competing for housing, upward pressure on rents, and a stronger appreciation outlook. For investors, growth markets offer a dual return: current cash flow plus equity buildup from rising values. The trade-off is that fast-growing markets often have higher prices, so cash flow margins may be thinner.
Next steps: Click any city above to see its full analysis page with interactive cap rate and cash-on-cash calculators pre-filled with local data. Browse our full markets index, or explore the interactive cap rate map to visualize these markets geographically.
For a comprehensive market selection framework, read our guide on how to analyze a rental property in 15 minutes or our guide to out-of-state investing.